Ordinary cities: Between modernity and development. Connecting sociology of architecture with science and technology studies (pp. In Architecture, materiality and society. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 3, 57–83. Place-identity: Physical world socialization of the self. International Review of Sociology, 15(3), 497–515. Elements of a theory of place attachment and socio-territorial belonging. Stoneham (Eds.), Governing human lives and health in pandemic times. Rre-vitalising discourses of solidarity: Governing populations in times of uncertainty and crisis. Wissenschaftliche Heimat in der Stiftung. Müller (Eds.), Infrastrukturen der Stadt (pp. Die Materialität urbaner Infrastrukturen und ihre Bedeutung für das Soziale. Interactional past and potential: The social construction of place attachment. Advances in theory, methods and applications (pp. Exploring the shadow side: Place attachment in the context of stigma, displacement, and social housing. What do cars do when they are parked? Material objects and infrastructuring in social practices. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 2(1), 18–28. Representation, legitimation, and autoethnography: An autoethnographic writing story. Roots and routes: Exploring the relationship between place attachment and mobility. Urban assemblages: How actor-network theory changes urban studies. American Psychological Association/Teachers College Press.įarias, I., & Bender, T. Hirsch (Ed.), A place to call home: After-school programs for urban youth (pp. Bundesministerium des Innern, für Bau und Heimat. Stadtentwicklungsbericht der Bundesregierung 2020 (p.
Left Coast Press.īundesministerium des Innern, für Bau und Heimat (Ed.). Evocative autoethnography: Writing lives and telling stories. This example then is evidence for the broader argument followed in this chapter that place attachment should be understood as dynamic over time and fundamentally intertwined with the material qualities of spaces and has the potential to contribute to social cohesion in an urban society. As a consequence of the constant interactions and reframings of attachment, place attachment can be understood as (1) processual in character, (2) only temporarily stable and (3) the result of an interplay of sociality and materiality. On the other hand, materiality serves as means to stabilise attachments to places and as means to re-frame local belonging and place attachment. Empirical data from autoethnographic observation and photographic documentation of the Georg-Büchner-Platz, a centrally located urban square in Darmstadt, highlight this double-sided relation: on the one hand, people establish attachments to particular places in their environment by interacting with other people and the ambient materiality. Based on a case study from Darmstadt, Germany, I show how citizens and urban materiality engage in a process of co-creating place attachment. In this chapter I argue that place attachment in cities stems from constant (re-)negotiatons between individuals and groups in urban space and their interaction with the space’s materiality.
0 kommentar(er)
